RuneAudio 0.3-alpha for Raspberry Pi

[ACX]

[lowpolyjoe]

The command spit out 'undefined' in the console window, then my share showed up and was browseable (in Chrome). Thanks!

>getDB({path: 'NAS'});
>undefined

By any chance, is there anything comparable to a console window on the iPhone Safari browser to perform a similar hack on that platform?

[bigme]

Everything is working well for me! Took me a while to get things configured properly, the location of my shared drive (192.xxx.x.xxx) would bring back a little 'red x' until I tried the computer name rather than IP address. Everything is now synced and streaming. I use MPDroid on my phone and tablet, and the web interface in chrome in Ubuntu, Windows Vista and Windows 7 seems perfect.
Abel

[Aquarius]

Dear all,

I'm new to these forums, reporting back on my install of 0.3 alpha on a R-pi B rev2. + Hifiberry Digi.

First of all I'm testing Rune as a current Volumio user. Since both project come from the same codebase and have since diverged, I noted some pros & cons:

Cons:
- Debian has been the cornerstone of my linux skills for the last 15 years, so learning Arch is a bit of a learning curve.

Pros
- The UI performance is indeed improved in Rune, and that's great.
- More polish seems to be included in management scripts (not having to reboot after loading I²S drivers, ...)

Can't compare sound quality yet (needs time and ideally a second Raspi) but both are great.

Now for the bugs:
- Some NFS mounts (not all, 1 out of 3 in my case) do not lead to an automatic database update. I still do not know what blocks it from being integrated. I have no access to my Raspi right know so can't post logs. will do this evening, hopefully. Clicking on the "Force update" lead to updating the current, already included, NFS mounts but not the new one.
- Michelangelo did some unothodox choices related to package management. Basically keeping a Wheezy core while adding Jessie packages when he saw the need. The result is that update & upgrade to jessie mostly breaks the UI, the mpd conf, or both. Which it shouldn't do. I came to Rune testing if it was the same and yes, sadly, trying to install things like xbmc broke my system.

Basically, I did:
pacman -Syu
pacman -S xbmc-rbp
and then, I had to do a "systemclt restart mpd" for each and every click on the RuneUI. Or else it would be stuck.

So my requests:
- Can you describe which conf file (if any) are modified/rewriten on a regular basis so that we can check/correct them after an upgrade/ package installation.
- Are there package that are not genuine Arch package but modified and recompiled by you ? So that we can prevent them from being overwritten?

anyway, congratulation on your work, that's really great.

[cmh714]

I have experienced the broken Volumio and/or Rune after pacman updates as well. However, since installing 0.3 that has NOT been a problem. I have been updating via pacman and via rpi-config with no problems whatsoever. And yes, I was surprised it worked....obviously, YMMV

[Aquarius]

Here's the log:

http://pastebin.com/kn6k4sne

But, it's easiest explained this way:

3 music directory mounts on the same NAS:

192.168.1.4:/medias/musique --> mounted as Musique under RuneUI
192.168.1.4:/medias/classique --> Classique
192.168.1.4/data/flac ---> New

And here's the output of df:

/dev/root 6316664 1505624 4472304 26% /
devtmpfs 219728 0 219728 0% /dev
tmpfs 223924 0 223924 0% /dev/shm
tmpfs 223924 304 223620 1% /run
tmpfs 223924 0 223924 0% /sys/fs/cgroup
tmpfs 223924 0 223924 0% /tmp
logs 5120 56 5064 2% /var/log
Ramdisk 262144 0 262144 0% /run/shm
rune-logs 20480 112 20368 1% /var/log/runeaudio
/dev/mmcblk0p1 91962 34838 57124 38% /boot
192.168.1.4:/medias/classique 1921316720 1831747008 89569712 96% /mnt/MPD/NAS/Classique
192.168.1.4:/data/flac 959890448 416230864 543659584 44% /mnt/MPD/NAS/New

Only two shares are listed (although all three seem ok under RuneUI)
BUT ! the one not parsed by the database updated is not the one missing here ! it's the "New" shared directory...

[Aquarius]

Ok I managed to have all 3 shares listed under df by setting one of them to write mode instead of read only, in the advanced settings...

weird

[johnbanks]

Help please ...
With 0.2 Beta if I did nano /etc/mtab I could see my mounted USB stick and NAS export listed.
Now doing the same with my running OK 0.3 Alpha, I do NOT see them listed. However if I do df I do see them.
Please educate me.
Thanks

[exetico]

Hello again,

Will we soon se a new alpha version of the software? I thinking about a update with bug-fixes etc.

I can't see any informations about the updates in the first post. Can anyone help me here?

Best regards

[ACX]